1 LCE Comprehension                         teacher copy                                                         TOTAL     / 50                      

Semester 1                                                                                                            

September resit 2004

 

This exam tests your listening comprehension of English.  The exam will last one hour; once the test has begun, no-one may enter or leave the exam room.  You will hear three separate recordings.  Each recording will be played one or two times.  You will answer the questions on your paper, making notes on the separate sheet provided.  Read the instructions for each part carefully: note especially that there is only ONE correct answer for multiple-choice questions.  Marks may also be deducted for incorrect responses in this section, as in all other sections of the test.

 

PART 1 Dolly’s creator      http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1487506

NPR investigates the possibility of cloning human beings

 

You will hear this recording ONCE only.  This is a multiple-choice section.  Circle the correct answer.  There is only one correct answer per question.  Points may be deducted for incorrect responses.

 

Teachers stop the tape for 2 minutes to allow students to prepare.

Here is the recording.

That is the end of the listening. 

Teachers stop the tape for 5 minutes to allow students to answer.

 

PART 2     Halfpennies        http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/1/newsid_2828000/2828819.stm

The BBC looks back at various opinions about the old half penny

 

You will hear this recording twice.  Decide whether the following statements are true (T) or false (F).  Circle the correct answer and justify your response in a few words.

 

Teachers stop the tape for two minutes to allow students to prepare.

Here is the first listening.

That is the end of the first listening.  Teachers stop the tape for 2 minutes to allow the students time to reflect.

Here is the second listening.

That is the end of the second listening. Teachers stop the tape for 5 minutes to allow students to answer.

 

PART 3                 Cannes Film festival           <http://discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1272489>

Riviera Radio is reporting the Cannes film festival

 

You will hear this recording TWICE.  Make notes on a separate sheet, then answer the questions as fully as possible.  Points will be deducted for missing information and language errors.

 

Teachers stop the tape for two minutes to allow the students to prepare.

Here is the first listening.

That is the end of the first listening.  Teachers stop the tape for 2 minutes to allow the students time to reflect.

Here is the second listening.

That is the end of the second listening.  Teachers stop the tape and give the students the remainder of the hour to complete the test.

 

Remember that no-one may leave the room until the test has ended and all papers have been turned in to the teacher.

 


PART 1

Now that farm animals can be cloned successfully, a nagging question hangs over scientists: Will cloning ever be safe enough to try in humans?  Well, the next month’s issue of the journal, Nature Reviews Genetics, Scottish scientist Ian Wilmut tries to answer that question (he led the team that produced Dolly the sheep, the world’s first cloned mammal).  NPR’s Joe Palca has more:

Ian Wilmut knew he was being provocative when he titled his upcoming paper, “Human Cloning: Can it be Made Safe?” 

“The provocative title does serve the purpose of catching the eye, not just of people like yourselves, but also of the scientific community.” 

The process of cloning is pretty much the same for any species.  Take the genes from an adult animal, put them into an egg, coax the egg to start dividing, and put the resulting embryo into a surrogate mother.  Wilmut says when you consider the safety of cloning, the first thing to know is that most of the time, it doesn’t work.

“The overall efficiency is something between 1 and 5 percent in all of the different species.  The precise pattern of failure in abnormalities may vary from one species to another, but the overall impact is very similar.” 

Wilmut says even in the clones that are born, the scientific literature is full of articles detailing the health problems: obesity, diabetes, lung problems, heart problems, limb deformities, and the list goes on.  Wilmut says anyone who says cloning is perfectly safe hasn’t read the literature. 

Randall Praither agrees.  He is a pig cloner at the University of Missouri:  “If you cherry pick, and you select certain reports, you can make it look very good.  For example, our last dozen or so pigs have appeared almost perfectly normal.  That’s in contrast to some of the very first ones that we made.  Do we know what the difference is?  No, we don’t know what we’re doing different.”

To find out why some clones have health problems and others don’t, Ian Wilmut has a suggestion: Do a systematic study of cloning, starting with the embryo, and going all the way to birth, and beyond:  “We would imagine using a well-established cloning procedure in the mouse and looking at developments sequentially at different stages.”  Wilmut says that would provide clues about how to change the cloning process to make it safer. 

But mass cloner Keith Laithem of Temple University says that’s just the start.  He says such a study would not provide a final answer about how to make cloning safe:  “If some suggestions come out of that analysis, and then you go and you change the cloning method, then you have to go and repeat the analysis to see if you’ve now made things better.” 

And there’s always the question of whether what works in animals will work the same in people:  “My personal philosophy is, you know, before I was going to use cloning, certainly for anything related to clinical application, you know, I would want to be working with a method that’s got a whole lot better success than 2 percent.”

For his part, Ian Wilmut says even animal cloners should proceed with caution.  Wilmut says his team will only use cloning when it’s absolutely essential to make a genetic copy of an animal with unique traits.  “But we probably wouldn’t support the idea of using the technique as it stands at the present time, just simply to increase our agricultural productivity because we would feel that the benefits that are gained don’t justify the risk of distress to the animals concerned.”  And certainly, Wilmut says, the risks of cloning don’t justify the potential benefit of a genetically related child. 

Joe Palca, NPR News, Washington.

 

ANSWERS:           12 points               

2 points for correct answer, -1 for incorrect, 0 for several answers, minimum total 0

 

1.E           2.A          3.B          4.C          5.D          6. A

 

1.E           2.C          3.D          4.D          5.B          6. C

 

 

PART 2 20 points

Journalist: Born in the new dawn of decimalization the tiny half-penny coin has always been something of a waif and stray. The Chancellor says it no longer fulfils a useful function. Increasingly, people simply store it away to exchange at a bank or donate to charity. It ends up in ashtrays, nondescript little boxes, or in a convenient milk or spirits bottle. Three thousand five hundred million half-pennies have circulated in thirteen years but many traders simply ignore it, even when it rings up on the tills or petrol pumps. The half-penny’s departure, by the end of this year, will clearly be unlamented.

Woman: People walk away without…if anything comes to half-pence; they never wait for their change.

Elderly man: [completely unintelligible to a Canadian]…can’t do anything with them at all.

 

2 points for correct answer with justification, no points for T/F without justification, no points if T/F wrong

 


1. The Chancellor thinks the half-penny coin is useful.

F              no longer useful function

 

2. People save up their half-penny coins.

T             exchange at bank or donate to charity

 

3. 350, 000, 000 half-penny coins were made.

T             three hundred and fifty milllion

 

4. The half-penny coin has existed for 30 years.

F              13

 

5. The coin is to be taken out of circulation next year.

F              by the end of the year

 

6. Most people will be sorry to see the half-penny go.

F              unlamented

 

7. The woman is probably a shopkeeper.

T             people never wait for their change

 

8. The man will probably welcome the half-penny's departure.

T             can't do anything with them

 

1. The Chancellor thinks the half-penny coin is useless.

T             no longer useful function

 

2. People simply throw their half-penny coins away.

F              store it away

 

3.3, 500, 000 half-penny coins were made.

F              three hundred and fifty million

 

4. The half-penny coin has existed for 13 years.

T             circulated in 13 years

 

5. The coin is to be taken out of circulation this year.

T             departure by the end of the year

 

6. Most people will not be sorry to see the half-penny go.

T             unlamented

 

7. The woman is probably a customer.

F              people never wait for their change

 

8. The man will probably regret the half-penny's departure.

F              can't do anything with them


 

PART 3                  20 points

 

The 56th Cannes international film festival’s in progress on the French Riviera. Amid the starlets, producers and paparazzi is morning edition and Los Angeles film critic Kenneth Teran. 

Bonjour!

Bonjour Bob!

Have you picked a winner yet?

Well, its hard to pick a winner, I mean, some of the films that are most anticipated haven’t been screened yet, but there are two films that people are talking about in the competition, one is a Canadian film by a man named Denis Arcand, who 15 years ago made a film named ‘The Decline of the American Empire,’ that was the most successful Canadian film ever, and he’s got a sequel to this film called ‘The Barbarian Invasion,’ and we like it it’s a warm film, it’s a human film, and you know this festival has been so lacklustre, that people are just embracing it.

I thought everything was a Canadian movie because they all shoot in Toronto

This film was shot in Montreal I think its French Canadian.

But how does this stack up against the others?

For me so far it’s the best.  The other one that people are talking about a lot which is a very, very strange film, even for Cannes which is kind of the home of strange films is Lars von Trier’s  film called Dogville.  Von Trier is a Danish director he made Dancer in the Dark a few years ago which won the palme d’or.  He’s a very cinematic director, he moves the camera a lot, but this is a film which is supposed to be a town but there are no props there are no sets where there are houses, there are rectangles drawn on the stage and it’s a three-hour movie about how a town really first embraces than rejects a woman who’s in trouble. 

This is, uh, Nicole Kidman isn’t it?

Nicole Kidman’s in it and she’s quite good in it, but uh, she can’t really do enough to make this film something you want to see.

Did, uh, you go to their news conference?

Yes I did go to the news conference, I did.

And what happened there?

Well, hahaha, you never know what’s gonna cause a fuss at Cannes.  One of the things that happened at the news conference is that Nicole Kidman started smoking! And uh, she did this in part to I think, uh, to get the attention of Lars von Trier, who doesn’t like people smoking, and um, I’m still not sure why Bob, but there were stories on the internet that said that this became an international scandal that she was smoking.

Wait a minute the French smoke.

I know the French smoke, they weren’t upset ha ha ha .

I think they’re lacking for something going on.

It’s really true this has been one of the quietest festivals in years, everyone from critics to the people that are here to buy films to the people who are here to sell films, everyone says that it’s been quiet.  There have been one or two small films, not in competition, but films that I really enjoyed that were different that are offbeat, that are kind of the things that you really go to Cannes for.  One of them, astonishingly enough is a feature-length animated film, by a Frenchman living in Canada.  It’s called Belleville Rendez-Vous , it s just really wacky its very caricatured the director is a former comic book artist, it’s about the kidnapping of a tour de France bicyclist and about how his grandmother has to rescue him, its just, um, insane, but very, very amusing. 

 

1. Why does the reporter say that it is hard to pick a winner at the Cannes film festival. 

some of the films haven’t been screened yet  2

 

2. What does he say is good about the film The Barbarian Invasion?

warm, human film                                 2

 

3. What is said about the director von Trier?

Danish,                                  1

made Dancer in the Dark     1

very cinematic,                     1

moves the camera a lot        1

 

4. What is odd about the film Dogville?

No props                                                               1

no sets                                                                   1

houses are rectangles drawn on stage             2

 

5. What did Nicole Kidman do at the news conference?  Why? 

started smoking                                                                                    2

to get the attention of Lars von Trier, who doesn’t like it             2

 

6. What is the film Belleville Rendez-vous about? 

The kidnapping of a tour de France cyclist     2

and about his rescue by his grandmother                       2